Angward

I would like some ones thoughts on this. I do not think the U S invaded Iraq over simple weopons violations. Rather 9*11 brought to light that it is enivitable that a nueclear weopon will detonated in an American and or European city within the next 10 years if the status quo continues. Someone as tallented as Osam would be creative enough to detonate 10 at once. There where 1,500 Soviet suitcase nucleur bombs made. Only 750 are accounted for. They only way to avoid this inevitability is for the US to remake the middle east in a way it remade western europe. The theocratic middle eastern dictatorships have to taken out one by one. The communist dictatorship of No. Korea also. This has nothing to do with imperialism. Imperialism implies wealth and power would be produced by these military adventures. Instead if the conservation of power where the primary goal isolationism would be far more lucrative. This remake will cost much more than the defeat of communism and fastism put together. There is no choice. This is survival.
Who else will do something - France? European imperialism drew the map of the middle east. How did you deal with the rise of Hitler? Didn't France abandon Nato when it needed her the most only to join after it was over? France could co-exist will the evil of communism, right. Why didn't you do something about Bosnia? Who paid billions in todays dolloars trillions to rebuild Europe, to protect her? People who do nothing avoid critism. People who do nothing and critsie are hipocrits. As an American I do not have that luxury.